removing the Canadian flag from the Quebec National Assembly

A hollow victory for new Quebec Premier Pauline Marois. Removal of the Canadian flag from the upper chamber was to be expected of the Parti Quebecois. It has been the party’s approach whenever elected to carry out the business of Quebec.

What is telling about this particular decision is that it stirs up little spontaneous anger or frustration in the rest of the Canada. I received not one email either protesting or acknowledging the PQ action. Not one!

Ms. Marois and her entire caucus were required though to swear allegiance to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II in order to take their seats in the National Assembly. That shouldn’t be interpreted as some kind of symbolic victory for federalism.

The fact is that for many, if not most Quebecers, what happens outside the boundaries of Quebec is of little or no interest. Quebec is increasingly insular and distant from things Canadian, or for that matter American.

I will be addressing the issue briefly on Saturday’s program and am sure I’ll hear that if the new Quebec government can do without displaying the national symbol in the legislature then it should also be willing to do without the multiples of billions of dollars in transfer payments the ROC annually directs toward Quebec.

The fact is that while Ms. Marois heads a minority government she does not have support for a sovereignty referendum. As distant as Quebecers may be from what takes place in the rest of Canada, they have, according to pollsters little interest in engaging in Sovereignty referendum III.

It is unfortunate really that Ms. Marois immediately felt it necessary to underscore her fundamental opposition for Quebec’s continued inclusion in Canada by removing the national flag. Besides, support for sovereignist parties in Quebec is nowhere near as solidly predictable as in years previous. Just ask Gilles Duceppe and the current federal Bloc Quebecois caucus of two.

5 thoughts on “removing the Canadian flag from the Quebec National Assembly

  1. Hello Mr. Green, always wondered if Quebec were to separate would they be intitled to the monitary value (10%) of all federal agencies and buildings throughout Canada.

    gary

  2. In the show there was an accepted premise that Quebec was a net recipient of $7b from Canada. I would like to see some research on that. All my Quebec friends “know” that Quebec is a net $ contributor to Canada. Which is it?

    If you take the sum total of all federal income tax paid by Quebec workers and corporations, plus all GST paid in Quebec, is that more than the $7b annual transfer payment?

    It would be interesting to know who is right.

    Good evening

    • suggest you do some research on the equalization funding formula Peter. It’s readily available through search engines like Google
      Roy.

  3. There were many blogs on the day the Canadian flag was taken down in Quebec

    I fully believe ethat the transfer payments should stop immediately.

    I live in Alberta now and am sick and tired of hearing Quebecors complain about our success here and at the same time take our money

  4. that 42% of Que9bec’s working ppaolution does not pay income tax. That’s a pretty large base that, for obvious reasons, doesn’t really care for a tax cut.Charest will make other concessions and the PQ will vote in favour of the budget. Contrary to what jeagag says, the PQ doesn’t have the most to gain from an election. Polls show that, if an election were held now, the ADQ would be in power. What boggles my mind the most about this absurd pissing oonctest is the fact that very little people have called out the PQ, and Pauline Marois, for opposing a tax cut that is essentially identical (at least in its intent) to the one Marois proposed when she was finance minister.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>